A Validation of the Subjective Vitality Scale Using Structural Equation Modeling

By Terence J. Bostic, Doris McGartland Rubio, Mark Hood. 2000

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00e72ec763b579955ef1d6a72883fe78a3e22217

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach (2006, methodology): “We used the six items identiﬁed by Bostic, Rubio, and Hood (2000) as the best ﬁtting (e.g., “I feel energized right now”).”
Associations Between Parental Psychological Control and Autonomy Support, and Psychological Outcomes in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration (2015, background): “The SVS had demonstrated good internal consistency, validity and factor structure in past works (Bostic et al. 2000; Gagne et al. 2003; Salama-Younes et al. 2009).”
Trait Mindfulness and Work-Family Balance among Working Parents: The Mediating Effects of Vitality and Sleep Quality. (2012, methodology): “Vitality was measured with a 6-item scale developed by Ryan and Frederick (1997) andmodified by Bostic et al. (2000) (e.”
Self-compassion and Eudaimonic Well-Being During Emotionally Difficult Times in Sport (2015, background): “The scale has evidence of validity and reliability (Bostic et al. 2000).”
A Multi-Study Examination of Well-Being Theory in College and Community Samples (2016, methodology): “1 Vitality Vitality was measured using the 6-item Subjective Vitality Scale developed by Ryan and Frederick (1997) and modified by Bostic et al. (2000). Both manuscripts identify good internal consistency (a range from .”
The scales of general well-being (SGWB) (2017, methodology): “Vitality was measured with the subjective vitality scale (Ryan & Frederick, 1997; Bostic et al., 2000) and the energy / general activation scale (Thayer, 1986).”
Pursuing Pleasure or Virtue: The Differential and Overlapping Well-Being Benefits of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives (2010, background): “These additional outcomes included: a sense of meaning, which reflects the degree to which one personally resonates with, comprehends, and values one’s activities and experiences, and which we considered essential to a well-rounded assessment of wellbeing, as several others have proposed (Battista a”
When helping helps: autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. (2010, methodology): “The single-factor structure of the full scale was validated in Bostic, Rubio, and Hood (2000).”