Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
By James C. Cox, Stephen C. Hayne. 2006
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00de1bdcc2f1bc399ba07cd6594871d844bb260e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- THE DECISION MAKER MATTERS: INDIVIDUAL VERSUS GROUP BEHAVIOUR IN EXPERIMENTAL BEAUTY- (2005, unknown): “…results indicate that group choices are more otherregarding than individual choices, which is in contrast to the findings of Bornstein and Yaniv or Cox. cyx +−3 Cox and Hayne (2002) have explored decision making of groups and individuals in common value auctions, characterized by risky outcomes.”
- Gender composition in teams (2006, unknown): “8 See Cason & Mui (1997), Bornstein & Yaniv (1998), Cox & Hayne (2002) , Hennig-Schmidt (2002),”
- Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size (2005, background): “worse results of teams than of individuals (Cox and Hayne, 2002; Kocher et al., 2004).”
- Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered (2009, unknown): “In auctions, teams display much more competitive bidding behavior leading to higher rates of overbidding ( Cox and Hayne 2006; Sutter et al. 2006).”
- Group and individual risk preferences : a lottery-choice experiment (2006, unknown): “…(Bornstein et al., 2004); ultimatum games (Bornstein and Yaniv, 1998); dictator games (Cason and Mui, 1997); signaling games (Cooper and Kagel, 2005); policy decisions (Blinder and Morgan, 2005); location and pricing (Barreda et al., 2002); and auctions (Cox and Hayne, 2006; Sutter et al., 2005).”
- Individuals and Teams in UMTS-License Auctions (2007, background): “An important complementary finding which suggests that teams are worse bidding agents than individuals in large-scale auctions from the viewpoint of companies comes from Cox and Hayne (2002). In this only other experimental study on the differences between individual and team bidding in auctions tha”