Batterer Intervention Systems: Issues, Outcomes, and Recommendations

By E. Gondolf. 2001

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00caf046caf366e70f5ed5ae4c3cc53155b6f403

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications (2004, methodology): “While about a third of the batterers’ female partners reported some contact with battered women’s services within the first 3 months of program intake (beyond contact with a legal advocate), only 8% of the women had any contact in the next 12 months (Gondolf, 2002b).”
The weak evidence for batterer program alternatives (2011, background): “In our multi-site evaluation of batterer intervention systems (Gondolf 2002), the African-American men were more than twice as likely to be rearrested for domestic violence during a 15-month follow-up period (13% versus 5% at the Pittsburgh site; n=210).”
Effects of Motivational Enhancement on Immediate Outcomes of Batterer Intervention (2011, background): “Following clients via police report data may also be necessary, although such data provides an underestimate of offending (Gondolf 2002).”
The Impact and Consequences of Partner Abuse on Partners (2012, background): “…or emotions that purportedly sustain the IPV has little empirical justification and may even lead to iatrogenic effects (e.g., Babcock et al., 2004; Feder & Forde, 2000; Gondolf, 2002; Morrel, Elliott, Murphy, & Taft, 2003; Murphy, Taft, & Eckhardt, 2007; Taft & Murphy, 2007; Watt & Howells, 1999).”
Anger Problem Profiles among Partner Violent Men: Differences in Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcome. (2007, result): “As in previous studies of partner violence intervention (Gondolf, 2002; Morrel, Elliott, Murphy, & Taft, 2003), collateral reports of abusive behavior were analyzed without regard to relationship separation status for the following reasons.”
THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO (2007, methodology): “For instance, our multi-site evaluation of batterer intervention presents some striking contradictory evidence regarding Duluth-type programs (for a summary, see Gondolf, 2002, 2004).”
Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations (2008, background): “A study by Gondolf of men in four batterer treatment programs found that 69% of the female partners had also assaulted their partner (Gondolf, 2002, p. 104).”
Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. (2003, background): “Under optimal conditions, such responses include adequate and swift adjudication, close supervision of parole outcomes through periodic court reviews or specialized probation programs, ongoing risk management for arrested perpetrators and ongoing safety planning for victims, and close supervision in”
Alcohol and intimate partner violence: a meta-analytic review. (2008, background): “In contrast, Gondolf and Foster (1991) found no association between alcohol and aggression severity in amilitary veteran sample.”
Gender symmetry in partner violence: Evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. (2009, background): “These studies generally find that approximately two thirds of men who complete treatment programs avoid physical reassault of their partners (Gondolf, 2002).”
Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment (2011, unknown): “(Gondolf, 2002) 482 Not specified, but”