Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird

By Jeffrey P Hoover. 2003

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0081ed3d4667c810aa45da98988b23596407c9c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, methodology): “Two or more consecutive like outcomes from breeding (e.g., a success after a success; a failure after a failure) constitute a strong evidence that a territory’s inherent quality for breeding is high or low (see Hoover 2003; Naves et al. 2006).”
Conspecific Attraction and the Conservation of Territorial Songbirds (2004, background): “In many species, individuals that reproduce successfully one year are more likely to return to a site in the following year (e.g., Bollinger & Gavin 1989; Haas 1998; Hoover 2003).”
Dynamic occupancy models reveal within-breeding season movement up a habitat quality gradient by a migratory songbird (2008, background): “Despite evidence that birds can shift locations during a breeding season (Krebs 1971, Hoover 2003), such shifts have seldom been quantified and reported from intensive demographic studies or from point-count surveys.”
The push and pull of climate change causes heterogeneous shifts in avian elevational ranges (2012, background): “, 2006), both of which can impact breeding site fidelity (Greenwood & Harvey, 1982; Hoover, 2003).”
Metapopulation consequences of site fidelity for colonially breeding mammals and birds (2005, background): “Fidelity may be shown towards the site of previous, successful breeding attempts ( Hoover 2003 ).”
Increasing the Accuracy of Productivity and Survival Estimates in Assessing Landbird Population Status (2005, background): “…given the inherent difficulties in detecting and quantifying bird movements (particularly movements of migratory birds between breeding seasons) and the lack of information on why adult birds exhibit breeding dispersal (Koenig et al. 1996; Murphy 1996; Haas 1998; Walters 2000; Hoover 2003).”
Effects of learning on evolution: robustness, innovation and speciation (2013, methodology): “…attempts failed were more likely to return to the same site in the following year if they had successful neighbours rather than failed neighbours, perhaps because the males monitored neighbouring territories, where they may have fathered offspring through extrapair copulations (Hoover 2003).”
Nest‐site fidelity and breeding success in White Stork Ciconia ciconia (2006, background): “2002, Hoover 2003). Younger breeders showed lower nest-site fidelity than adults, statistically corroborating the suggestions made by Schulz (1998). Variation in nest-site fidelity was explained by age and breeding outcome (success vs.”
Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation (2009, background): “Hoover (2003) found such an effect in his experimental manipulation of breeding success in prothonotary warblers; a warbler experiencing nest failure tended to remain on its territory if its neighbours did not suffer nest predation.”
Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives (2015, unknown): “This hypothesis was originally tested in relation to patch-scale fidelity (e.g. Bollinger and Gavin 1989; Hoover 2003), a scale at which it might be an evolutionary stable strategy (Schmidt 2001).”