Measuring Alliances: the Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816–2000

By Douglas M. Gibler, M. Sarkees. 2004

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0067235ea93c6653adfdfc62ae3fdc5fa833c3b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Tatiana Vashchilko
2. Quan Li
3. Douglas M. Gibler
4. Jing-Lin Duanmu
5. Sonal S. Pandya
6. J. Ray

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Tatiana Vashchilko
2. Quan Li
3. Douglas M. Gibler
4. J. Ray

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Tatiana Vashchilko
2. Quan Li
3. Douglas M. Gibler

Citations in the corpus

• The Costs of Reneging (2008, methodology): “Finally, a defense pact in the dyad—a dummy variable for Correlates of War Type I alliances (Gibler and Sarkees 2004)—often denotes the tabling of threats within the dyad and is therefore likely to be peaceful.”
• Rules over Real Estate (2005, unknown): “1 = defense, 2 = neutrality or nonaggression, 3 = entente, 4 = no alliance agreement (M = 2.757, SD = 1.45); http://cow2.la.psu.edu/ (Gibler and Sarkees 2004).”
• Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000 (2004, unknown): “Gibler and Sarkees 2004.”
• Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows (2010, background): “Alliance is typically easily observed, because it is a formal written agreement between two or more states that is ratified and specifies the obligations of the alliance members (Gibler & Sarkees, 2004).”