Measuring changes in international production from a disruption: Case study of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Multiregional Impact Assessment Model for disaster analysis (2016, background): “, 2015) and earthquakes in specific (Cho et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2002; MacKenzie et al., 2012; Arto et al., 2015).”
The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Review of Models and Empirical Studies (2019, background): “Molinari et al. (2017) review approaches for validating catastrophe models, which include comparing modeled hazard characteristics and projected damages with observations from events.”
Regional disaster impact analysis: comparing Input-Output and Computable General Equilibrium models (2015, unknown): “Besides adding a time and resilience dimension, IO models have also been extended spatially by applying an interregional model instead of the traditional single-region model (see e.g. Cho et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2002; Okuyama et al. 2004; Crowther and Haimes, 2005; MacKenzie et al., 2012).”
DISASTER IMPACT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS (2014, methodology): “For example, MacKenzie et al. (2012) used a multi-regional IO analysis to decompose the short-term supply chain disruption rendered by the 2011 East Japan Earthquake to the automobile sector of selected countries and the rest of the world.”