Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model

By Norman P. Li, K. Valentine, Lily Patel. 2011

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Sex differences have been found in mate preferences across several decades. Especially for long-term partners, men tend to value physical attractiveness and women tend to value social status. However, the sexes both value various other traits even more highly. Such findings thus diminish the importance of the sex differences and challenge the theoretical importance that evolutionary psychologists place on physical attractiveness and social status. Using a budget allocation methodology to examine mate pref- erences in both the US and Singapore, we found not only the usual sex differences, but also evidence that men prioritize physical attractiveness and women prioritize social status as necessities in their long-term mates. We also found that both sexes tend to value physical attractiveness as a necessity in short-term mates. Results replicate previous budget allocation findings and provide cross-cultural validation for a mate preference priorities model.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00216ad840334e74c5ef2c586a059275ef3eaaa0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Victor X. Luevano
  2. Heather M. Adams
  3. P. Jonason
  4. April H. Bailey
  5. Marianne LaFrance
  6. John F. Dovidio
  7. Gregory D. Webster
  8. Norman P. Li

In Marketing

  1. John F. Dovidio
  2. Heather M. Adams
  3. P. Jonason
  4. Victor X. Luevano

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. April H. Bailey
  2. Marianne LaFrance
  3. John F. Dovidio
  4. Heather M. Adams
  5. P. Jonason
  6. Victor X. Luevano
  7. S. Gaertner
  8. M. Hogg

Citations in the corpus