Amanda R. Kreider

Statistics and Probability · 2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 11 citations into it

Whom Amanda R. Kreider trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Donald B. Rubin
2. Peter C. Austin
3. J. Lunceford
4. Jeffrey A. Smith
5. Daniel E. Ho

Who trusts Amanda R. Kreider overall

1. Sudeepa Roy
2. Cynthia Rudin
3. Harsh Parikh

Papers from Amanda R. Kreider's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Amanda R. Kreider trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Full Matching in an Observational Study of Coaching for the SAT
2. The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials
3. MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference
4. Observational data for comparative effectiveness research: an emulation of randomised trials to estimate the effect of statins on primary prevention of coronary heart disease
5. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study
6. Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival and Repeated Measures Models (Technometrics)
7. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments (Statistics in Medicine)
8. Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?
9. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
10. Observational Studies

Their papers

• Practice of Epidemiology Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures (2015)