D. Peikes

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · 2008–2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 3 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom D. Peikes trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. James J. Heckman
  2. Jeffrey A. Smith
  3. Petra E. Todd
  4. R. Lalonde
  5. Thomas Bodenheimer
  6. E. Coleman
  7. Hidehiko Ichimura
  8. Paul R. Rosenbaum

Who trusts D. Peikes overall

  1. Sheng Li
  2. V. Basevi
  3. Yun Raymond Fu
  4. Judea Pearl
  5. Matthieu Clément
  6. M. Smith
  7. M. Lechner

Papers from D. Peikes's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers D. Peikes trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
  2. Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
  3. Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data
  4. Lost in Transition: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving the Quality of Transitional Care (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  5. Nonexperimental Versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings Impacts
  6. Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?
  7. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  8. Meta-Analysis: Secondary Prevention Programs for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  9. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. (Archives of Internal Medicine)
  10. Can Propensity-Score Methods Match the Findings from a Random Assignment Evaluation of Mandatory Welfare-to-Work Programs? (Review of Economics and Statistics)

Their papers