Kathryn Zeiler

Economics and Econometrics · 2007–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Economics and Econometrics — 34 citations into it; #9,241 of 23,481 by trust here, #13,168 by citations
• General Decision Sciences — 30 citations into it; #696 of 1,995 by trust here, #1,094 by citations
• Safety Research — 21 citations into it; #1,638 of 5,829 by trust here, #2,873 by citations

Whom Kathryn Zeiler trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Daniel Kahneman
2. John A. List
3. J. Knetsch
4. Amos Tversky
5. Charles R. Plott

Who trusts Kathryn Zeiler overall

1. Timothy N. Cason
2. J. Knetsch
3. K. Ericson
4. Charles R. Plott
5. Wei-Kang Wong

Papers from Kathryn Zeiler's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Kathryn Zeiler trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model
2. Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
3. Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets
4. Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
5. Are Adults Better Behaved Than Children? Age, Experience, and the Endowment Effect.
6. Aging and decision making: a comparison between neurologically healthy elderly and young individuals
7. Behavioral Law and Economics: Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
8. ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
9. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies
10. On the theory of reference-dependent preferences

Their papers

• Exchange asymmetries incorrectly interpreted as evidence of endowment effect theory and prospect theory (2007) — 257 citations
• The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the 'Endowment Effect,' Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations (2011) — 114 citations