Jaro Karppinen

The Lancet · 2009–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 0 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Papers from Jaro Karppinen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jaro Karppinen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations
  2. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  3. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (British medical journal)
  4. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
  5. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
  6. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
  7. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  8. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  9. Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (Epidemiology)
  10. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)

Their papers