Kiduk Yang

Statistics and Probability · 2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 20 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Kiduk Yang trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Lutz Bornmann

Who trusts Kiduk Yang overall

  1. Chaomei Chen
  2. Anne-Wil Harzing
  3. Mike Thelwall
  4. Peder Olesen Larsen
  5. Hugo Baier-Fuentes
  6. Sergio Alonso
  7. Andrew F. Johnson
  8. Ron van der Wal
  9. Markus von Ins
  10. Ludo Waltman

Papers from Kiduk Yang's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Kiduk Yang trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university
  2. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA)
  3. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (Scientometrics)
  4. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (Scientometrics)
  5. Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. (Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology)
  6. Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals
  7. As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases
  8. Google Scholar: the pros and the cons (Online information review (Print))
  9. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  10. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)

Their papers