Matthew Kay

Statistics and Probability · 2015–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Matthew Kay trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. John K. Kruschke
  2. Michael Smithson
  3. M. Heilman
  4. Latanya Sweeney
  5. Shelley J. Correll
  6. J. Verkuilen
  7. Jock D. Mackinlay
  8. Peter Kampstra
  9. Helen Nissenbaum
  10. Batya Friedman

Who trusts Matthew Kay overall

  1. L. Elisa Celis
  2. Jieyu Zhao
  3. Vinay Uday Prabhu
  4. Andrew Gelman
  5. Vijay Keswani
  6. Kaiyu Yang
  7. Dana Pessach
  8. Yang Trista Cao
  9. Tianlu Wang
  10. Q. Liao

Papers from Matthew Kay's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Matthew Kay trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. (Psychological methods)
  2. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder.
  3. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information
  4. Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
  5. Bias in computer systems
  6. Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations (International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems)
  7. Evaluation of Gender Classification Methods with Automatically Detected and Aligned Faces (IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence)
  8. Bayesian data analysis.
  9. Social stereotypes and social groups.
  10. Semiology of Graphics - Diagrams, Networks, Maps

Their papers