M. Schuler

Statistics and Probability · with Faller · 2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Schuler trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. W. Viechtbauer
  2. K. F. Schulz
  3. Douglas G. Altman

Papers from M. Schuler's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Schuler trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
  2. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials (Obstetrics and Gynecology)
  3. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (British medical journal)
  4. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (British medical journal)
  5. Accounting for Heterogeneity via Random-Effects Models and Moderator Analyses in Meta-Analysis
  6. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
  7. Psychosocial Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: Meta-Analyses (International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine)
  8. High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients (British Journal of Cancer)
  9. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  10. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)

Their papers