Philip Stephens

Nature and Landscape Conservation · 2002–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 29 researchers and is trusted by 35 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Philip Stephens trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. K. Burnham
  2. David R. Anderson
  3. Brian Dennis
  4. L. Eberhardt
  5. Jerald B. Johnson
  6. J. Pearce
  7. Shinichi Nakagawa
  8. Wilfried Thuiller
  9. S. Richards
  10. R. Freckleton

Who trusts Philip Stephens overall

  1. Shinichi Nakagawa
  2. L. Garamszegi
  3. R. Freckleton
  4. Roger Mundry
  5. Harlan Campbell
  6. Benjamin M. Bolker
  7. W. J. Sutherland
  8. K. Norris
  9. M. Galipaud
  10. S. Richards

Papers from Philip Stephens's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Philip Stephens trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative
  2. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. (Ecology Letters)
  3. A new look at the statistical model identification
  4. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? (Journal of Animal Ecology)
  5. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
  6. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression
  7. BIOMOD – optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change
  8. Dealing with collinearity in behavioural and ecological data: model averaging and the problems of measurement error (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology)
  9. Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies
  10. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

Their papers