William La Cava
Artificial Intelligence · 2017–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Artificial Intelligence — 34 citations into it
- Evaluation & Benchmarks — 13 citations into it
- Genetics — 8 citations into it
- Optimization & Training — 8 citations into it
- Information Systems — 7 citations into it
- Computational Theory and Mathematics — 6 citations into it
- Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it
- Safety, Robustness & Interpretability — 5 citations into it
Whom William La Cava trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Ronald J. Williams
- Michael D. Schmidt
- Jaka Demsar
- Cynthia Rudin
- Tianqi Chen
- Trevor J. Hastie
- Igor Kononenko
- S. Udrescu
- Brenden K. Petersen
- David Ruppert
Who trusts William La Cava overall
- Nour Makke
- Alexey Ignatiev
- Mikoláš Janota
- André Schidler
- Nina Narodytska
- Sanjay Chawla
- Harvey Wu
- Chi Wang
Papers from William La Cava's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers William La Cava trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
- Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition (Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)
- ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
- Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization (International Conference on Learning Representations)
- Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
- Long Short-Term Memory
- Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
- Attention is All you Need (Neural Information Processing Systems)
- Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
- Simple Statistical Gradient-Following Algorithms for Connectionist Reinforcement Learning
Their papers
- PMLB: a large benchmark suite for machine learning evaluation and comparison (2017) — 459 citations
- Relief-Based Feature Selection: Introduction and Review (2017) — 1,180 citations
- Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performance (2021) — 418 citations