William Ratliff
Artificial Intelligence · 2019
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Artificial Intelligence — 17 citations into it
- Safety, Robustness & Interpretability — 9 citations into it
Whom William Ratliff trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Papers from William Ratliff's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers William Ratliff trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The mythos of model interpretability
- Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
- Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
- Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation
- Model Cards for Model Reporting
- Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
- Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset
- Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis (New England Journal of Medicine)
- How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
- The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine
Their papers
- "The human body is a black box": supporting clinical decision-making with deep learning (2019) — 220 citations