Annette van Dijk

Statistics and Probability · 2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Annette van Dijk trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. John P. A. Ioannidis
  2. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
  3. John K. Kruschke
  4. R. Nickerson

Who trusts Annette van Dijk overall

  1. K. Paap
  2. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
  3. Jelte M. Wicherts
  4. John P. A. Ioannidis

Papers from Annette van Dijk's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Annette van Dijk trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  2. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  3. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  4. Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research
  5. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
  6. F1000Prime recommendation of False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.
  7. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. (Psychological methods)
  8. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (Psychology Science)
  9. “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (PLoS ONE)
  10. The same old New Look: Publication bias in a study of wishful seeing

Their papers