Anthony P. Burgard

Molecular Biology · 2003–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 23 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Anthony P. Burgard trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Jeremy S. Edwards
  2. Bernhard O. Palsson
  3. C. Schilling
  4. Nathan D. Price
  5. Jason A. Papin
  6. Jennie L. Reed
  7. Rafael U. Ibarra
  8. Markus W. Covert
  9. Albert-László Barabási
  10. David A. Fell

Who trusts Anthony P. Burgard overall

  1. Bernhard O. Palsson
  2. Maxime Durot
  3. Costas D. Maranas
  4. Prit Pharkya
  5. Matthew A. Oberhardt
  6. Ali R. Zomorrodi
  7. Karthik Raman
  8. Kiran Raosaheb Patil
  9. Nathan E. Lewis
  10. Isabel Rocha

Papers from Anthony P. Burgard's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Anthony P. Burgard trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Metabolic modeling of microbial strains in silico. (TIBS -Trends in Biochemical Sciences. Regular ed)
  2. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks (Nature)
  3. Theory for the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. (Journal of Theoretical Biology)
  4. An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR) (Genome Biology)
  5. Genome-scale microbial in silico models: the constraints-based approach. (Trends in Biotechnology)
  6. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. (Genome Research)
  7. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data (Nature Biotechnology)
  8. Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation (Nature)
  9. Thirteen Years of Building Constraint-Based In Silico Models of Escherichia coli (Journal of Bacteriology)
  10. The small world inside large metabolic networks (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences)

Their papers