A. Strother

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 9 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 8 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it
• Applied Psychology — 5 citations into it

Whom A. Strother trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. S. Parsons
2. Klaus Fiedler

Papers from A. Strother's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers A. Strother trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Reliability of two versions of the dot-probe task using photographic faces
2. Unreliability of the dot probe task
3. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. (Psychological bulletin)
4. Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. (Annual Review of Clinical Psychology)
5. The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions (Current Directions in Psychological Science)
6. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (Nature Reviews Neuroscience)
7. Data sharing in neuroimaging research (Front. Neuroinform.)
8. Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology †
9. The relationship between self-report and lab task conceptualizations of impulsivity
10. Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (bioRxiv)

Their papers

• Psychological measurement and the replication crisis: Four sacred cows. (2020) — 104 citations