W. Philip Kegelmeyer Jr.
Artificial Intelligence · 2002–2012
A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 17 researchers and is trusted by 124 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Artificial Intelligence — 18 citations into it; #2,106 of 35,345 by trust here, #1,878 by citations
- Evaluation & Benchmarks — 9 citations into it
- Information Systems — 7 citations into it; #4,266 of 8,771 by trust here, #4,885 by citations
- Statistical Learning Theory — 7 citations into it; #139 of 1,038 by trust here, #48 by citations
- Natural Language Processing — 7 citations into it
Whom W. Philip Kegelmeyer Jr. trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Leo Breiman
- J. Ross Quinlan
- T. Griffiths
- Thomas G. Dietterich
- David M. Blei
- Nitesh V. Chawla
- Daniel D. Lee
- William W. Cohen
- Chih-Jen Lin
- Jaka Demsar
Who trusts W. Philip Kegelmeyer Jr. overall
- Nitesh V. Chawla
- Alberto Fernández
- Andrea Dal Pozzolo
- Shuo Wang
- Octavio Loyola-González
- Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar
- Bartosz Krawczyk
- Francisco Herrera
- David A. Cieslak
- Victoria López
Papers from W. Philip Kegelmeyer Jr.'s perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers W. Philip Kegelmeyer Jr. trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
- Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition (Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)
- Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization (International Conference on Learning Representations)
- ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
- Latent Dirichlet Allocation
- LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
- ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
- Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
- Attention is All you Need (Neural Information Processing Systems)
- Random Forests
Their papers
- SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (2002) — 31,281 citations
- Exploring Topic Coherence over Many Models and Many Topics (2012) — 573 citations
- Hellinger distance decision trees are robust and skew-insensitive (2011)
- Hellinger distance decision trees are robust and skew-insensitive (2011) — 251 citations