Michael Paul

Artificial Intelligence · with Bentivogli · 2011–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Artificial Intelligence — 13 citations into it
• Evaluation & Benchmarks — 12 citations into it; #2,017 of 3,147 by trust here, #2,627 by citations
• Natural Language Processing — 9 citations into it

Whom Michael Paul trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. J. Fleiss
2. Alon Lavie
3. Joseph P. Turian
4. Matthew G. Snover
5. Philipp Koehn

Who trusts Michael Paul overall

1. Mauro Cettolo
2. Anthony Rousseau

Papers from Michael Paul's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Michael Paul trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation
2. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co-occurrence statistics
3. A Study of Translation Edit Rate with Targeted Human Annotation
4. (Meta-) Evaluation of Machine Translation
5. Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation
6. METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments
7. Evaluation of machine translation and its evaluation (Machine Translation Summit)
8. Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction
9. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
10. Fast, Cheap, and Creative: Evaluating Translation Quality Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk

Their papers

• The IWSLT 2011 Evaluation Campaign on Automatic Talk Translation (2012) — 42 citations
• Overview of the IWSLT 2011 evaluation campaign (2011) — 84 citations