J. Rankin

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · with Bell · 2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom J. Rankin trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Richard L. Tweedie (in Statistics and Probability)

Papers from J. Rankin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Rankin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
  2. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  3. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
  4. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)
  5. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  6. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
  7. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  8. Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (Epidemiology)
  9. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  10. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers