Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham

Economics and Econometrics · The American Economic Review · 2010–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Jeffrey R. Kling
  2. Guido W. Imbens
  3. David Card
  4. Alberto Abadie
  5. Joshua D. Angrist
  6. Keisuke Hirano
  7. Fan Li
  8. Tin Kam Ho
  9. Susan Athey
  10. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge

Who trusts Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham overall

  1. Marius Faber
  2. Victor Couture
  3. Gabriel Chodorow-reich
  4. M. Almunia
  5. Hyun Song Shin
  6. Robert M. Bushman
  7. P. Nenov
  8. Pol Antràs
  9. Cecile Gaubert
  10. Jessie Handbury

Papers from Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score
  2. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
  3. Random Forests
  4. [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies
  5. Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania
  6. Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting
  7. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
  8. Statistics and Causal Inference
  9. VARIETIES OF SELECTION BIAS
  10. The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests

Their papers