Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

By Gillian D. Sanders, P. Neumann, A. Basu, D. Brock, D. Feeny, M. Krahn, K. Kuntz, David O. Meltzer, D. Owens, L. Prosser and 6 more. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2016

2,775 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/232544be1984418eaf5c4f67bf9a35ab11895678

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Mauskopf
2. E. Loder
3. E. de Bekker-Grob

Citations in the corpus

• Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force. (2022, methodology): “Creating a structured table (called an “impact inventory”) developed by the Second Panel may be helpful in conveying what costs and consequences were considered.(38) This will also facilitate reporting disaggregated impacts across these sectors and perspectives when reporting results, which is stron”
• Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022, neutral): “This includes an update of methods proposed by the Second Panel on Cost‐Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (“Second Panel”), which contained new recommendations concerning the perspective of economic evaluations, the classification of costs and benefits in a structured table, and the inclusion of ”