Whakapapa as a Maori Mental Construct: Some Implications for the Debate over Genetic Modification of Organisms

By M. Roberts, Bradford Haami, R. Benton, Terre Satterfield, Melissa L. Finucane, M. Henare, M. Hēnare. 2004

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Geography, Planning and Development

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fffdb929c577a30395258132126c4085d7b1f481

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Holup
2. Kai Ma Chan
3. Terre Satterfield
4. J. Goldstein
5. Melissa L. Finucane
6. Paul Slovic
7. T. Terpstra
8. Sarah K. Howard

Citations in the corpus

• Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values (2012, background): “…New Zealand, for example, the properties/values known as ‘mauri’ and ‘whakapapa’ fundamentally challenged that country's risk regulatory agency as both values were said to be transgressed by the creation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) (Roberts et al., 2004; Satterfield and Roberts, 2008).”
• Risk as Value: Combining Affect and Analysis in Risk Judgments (2006, background): “, radon, global climate change, genetic engineering) and their consequences (Atman et al., 1994; Bostrom et al., 1994a, 1994b; Roberts et al., 2004).”