Source Scaling Properties from Finite-Fault-Rupture Models

By P. M. Mai, Gregory C. Beroza. 2000

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffea93341f52aae86728d72ed5f614d2c4dc9eb5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

Citations in the corpus

Indications for a successively triggered rupture growth underlying the 2000 earthquake swarm in Vogtland/NW Bohemia (2002, neutral): “For comparison, the corresponding values for large tectonic earthquakes are plotted [Mai and Beroza,2000].”
Earthquake Surface Slip-Length Data is Fit by Constant Stress Drop and is Useful for Seismic Hazard Analysis (2013, methodology): “Comparisons have been made using surface data and finite-source inversions (Mai and Beroza, 2000; Manighetti et al., 2007).”
Aftershock Zone Scaling (2002, neutral): “…Geller, 1976; Sato, 1979; Romanowicz, 1994; Wells and Coppersmith, 1994; Abercrombie, 1995; Pegler and Das, 1996; Scholz, 1997, 1998; Bodin and Brune, 1996; Wang and Ou, 1998; Mai and Beroza, 2000; Stock and Smith, 2000; Fujii and Matsu’ura, 2000; Shaw and Scholz, 2001, and references therein).”
A Pseudo-Dynamic Approximation to Dynamic Rupture Models for Strong Ground Motion Prediction (2004, methodology): “Coppersmith, 1994; Somerville et al., 1997; Mai and Beroza, 2000 ).”
Earthquake scaling relations for mid‐ocean ridge transform faults (2004, background): “…rupture width [Romanowicz, 1992, 1994; Romanowicz and Ruff, 2002], length [Scholz, 1994a, 1994b; Hanks and Bakun, 2002], or something in between [Mai and Beroza, 2000; P. Somerville, personal communication, 2003]; (3) the outer scale of faulting, i.e., the relationship between fault dimension…”
Evidence for self-similar, triangular slip distributions on earthquakes: Implications for earthquake and fault mechanics. (2005, background): “…whether or not mean slip would scale with rupture width or length, that is, stress drop would be independent of earthquake size or not [Scholz, 1982; Romanowicz, 1992; Scholz, 1994a, 1994b; Bodin and Brune, 1996; Mai and Beroza, 2000; Shaw and Scholz, 2001] (see Scholz [2002] for a review).”
Strong Ground-Motion Prediction from Stochastic-Dynamic Source Models (2003, methodology): “Extrapolating from Andrews and Boatwright (1998) tests based on a finite-difference code, this grid size should result in accurate slip-velocity spectra up to about 1 Hz. We compute ground velocity at the observer locations shown in Figure 1 using the discretewavenumber/finite-element method of Olso”
Observational constraints on the fracture energy of subduction zone earthquakes (2004, background): “Mai and Beroza [2000] on the other hand, use an autocorrelation width to determine the effective fault dimensions and also normalize the effective mean slip so that the seismic moment of the fault remains unchanged.”
The seismic cycle at subduction thrusts: Insights from seismo‐thermo‐mechanical models (2013, background): “This very low strength model has larger than expected rupture widths [e.g., Mai and Beroza, 2000], since the low stresses increase viscosities near the brittle-ductile transition (equation (9)).”