Entanglement scaling of operators: a conformal field theory approach, with a glimpse of simulability of long-time dynamics in 1 + 1d

By J. Dubail. 2016

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In one dimension, the area law and its implications for the approximability by matrix product states are the key to efficient numerical simulations involving quantum states. Similarly, in simulations involving quantum operators, the approximability by matrix product operators (in Hilbert–Schmidt norm) is tied to an operator area law, namely the fact that the operator space entanglement entropy (OSEE)—the natural analog of entanglement entropy for operators, investigated by Zanardi (2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 040304) and by Prosen and Pižorn (2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 032316)—is bounded. In the present paper, it is shown that the OSEE can be calculated in two-dimensional conformal field theory, in a number of situations that are relevant to questions of simulability of long-time dynamics in one spatial dimension. It is argued that: (i) thermal density matrices ρ∝e−βH and generalized Gibbs ensemble density matrices ρ∝e−HGGE with local HGGE generically obey the operator area law; (ii) after a global quench, the OSEE first grows linearly with time, then decreases back to its thermal or GGE saturation value, implying that, while the operator area law is satisfied both in the initial state and in the asymptotic stationary state at large time, it is strongly violated in the transient regime; (iii) the OSEE of the evolution operator U(t)=e−iHt increases linearly with t, unless the Hamiltonian is in a localized phase; (iv) local operators in Heisenberg picture, ϕ(t)=eiHtϕe−iHt, have an OSEE that grows sublinearly in time (perhaps logarithmically), however it is unclear whether this effect can be captured in a traditional CFT framework, as the free fermion case hints at an unexpected breakdown of conformal invariance.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffe10df552e1b7893a78af7d7049e841cad94a3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. V. Khemani
  2. A. Nahum
  3. D. Huse
  4. Matthew Fisher
  5. Brian Swingle
  6. Tianci Zhou
  7. Shenglong Xu
  8. S. Gopalakrishnan

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. Huse
  2. A. Nahum
  3. V. Khemani

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. A. Nahum
  2. V. Khemani
  3. D. Huse
  4. Brian Swingle
  5. Shenglong Xu
  6. S. Gopalakrishnan
  7. M. Pretko
  8. R. Nandkishore

Citations in the corpus