Performance of farmed, hybrid, and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) families in a natural river environment
By Ø. Skaala, Kevin Glover, B. Barlaup, T. Svåsand, F. Besnier, M. M. Hansen, R. Borgstrøm. 2012
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffd24354d80bc43610b8f33d206b3d6cec9a0e93
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- K. Boxaspen
- G. Taranger
- P. Fiske
- Ø. Karlsen
- Sten Karlsson
- O. Diserud
- P. Bjørn
- R. Bannister
Citations in the corpus
- Risk assessment of the environmental impact of Norwegian Atlantic salmon farming (2015, background): “Nevertheless, comparative studies in Ireland and Norway have demonstrated additive genetic variation for fitness in the wild, with offspring of farmed salmon displaying lower survival than fish of native origin (McGinnity et al., 1997, 2003; Fleming et al., 2000; Skaala et al., 2012).”
- The major threats to Atlantic salmon in Norway (2017, unknown): “River scale experiments in Imsa and the Guddalselva in Norway and Burrishoole in Ireland have documented how escaped farmed Atlantic salmon, their offspring and hybrid offspring from mating with wild Atlantic salmon can affect wild populations negatively (Fleming et al., 2000; McGinnity et al., 2003”
- Widespread genetic introgression of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon in wild salmon populations (2016, background): “Experimental studies generally show a lower lifetime survival of farmed offspring than wild offspring, with hybrid groups being intermediate (McGinnity et al., 1997, 2003; Fleming et al., 2000; Skaala et al., 2012).”
- Half a century of genetic interaction between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: Status of knowledge and unanswered questions (2017, unknown): “…strains and environmental context of the experiments reported in the studies above, there is a remarkable consistency in the outcomes of the experiments in Norway and Ireland and among cohorts compared in the same locations (Fleming et al., 2000; McGinnity et al., 1997, 2003; Skaala et al., 2012).”