Further refinement of the structure of yeast tRNAPhe.

By B. Hingerty, R. S. Brown, A. Jack. 1978

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jane S. Richardson
2. David C Richardson
3. J. Word
4. S. Lovell
5. T. LaBean
6. Hope C. Taylor
7. Michael E. Zalis
8. Brent K. Presley

Citations in the corpus

• Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 (2023, neutral): “5,6 For many years, x-ray crystallographic structures of RNA nucleosides and nucleotides allowed us to grasp the fundamentals of RNA stereochemistry.”
• Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. (1999, background): “However, for structures with non-canonical conformations, e.g. 299D (Scott et al., 1996), 4TNA (Hingerty et al., 1978), and 1YTF (Tan et al., 1996) at 2.5-3.0 A Ê and even for Z-form DNA in 131D (Bancroft et al., 1994) or 1D53 (Kumar et al., 1992) at 1.0-1.5 A Ê , there are usually serious clashes…”