Consistent Quantum Theory

By R. Griffiths. 2001

554 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of -ontology Theorems (2014, background): “as consistent/decoherent histories [144] and Sorkin’s co-event formalism [145, 146] are based on taking the space-time picture provided by the path integral seriously.”
Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision (2012, methodology): “This is called the principle of unicity (Griffiths, 2003).”
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2016, background): “22 of [35] as well as [70] for a discussion).”
Between classical and quantum (2005, methodology): “Like decoherence, the consistent histories method has been the subject of lengthy reviews (Hartle, 1995) and even books (Omnès, 1994, 1999; Griffiths, 2002) by the founders.”
Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference (2006, background): “…(Pearle 1976, 1979, 1989; Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber 1986),whi h are being subje ted to ever more stringent experimental tests(Pearle and Valentini 2006); and theories of ` onsistent' or `de oherent'histories (Gri ths 1984, 2002; Gell-Mann and Hartle 1990; Hartle 1995;Omnès 1992, 1994).”