Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies
By M. Law, J. Morris, N. Wald. British medical journal, 2009
2,754 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Objectives To determine the quantitative efficacy of different classes of blood pressure lowering drugs in preventing coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, and who should receive treatment. Design Meta-analysis. Data source Medline (1966-2007). Study selection Randomised trials of blood pressure lowering drugs recording CHD events and strokes. 108 trials studied differences in blood pressure between study drug and placebo (or control group not receiving the study drug) (“blood pressure difference trials”), and 46 trials compared drugs (“drug comparison trials”). Seven trials with three randomised groups fell into both categories. The results were interpreted in the context of those expected from the largest published meta-analysis of cohort studies, totalling 958 000 people. Participants 464 000 people defined into three mutually exclusive categories: participants with no history of vascular disease, a history of CHD, or a history of stroke. Results In the blood pressure difference trials β blockers had a special effect over and above that due to blood pressure reduction in preventing recurrent CHD events in people with a history of CHD: risk reduction 29% (95% confidence interval 22% to 34%) compared with 15% (11% to 19%) in trials of other drugs. The extra effect was limited to a few years after myocardial infarction, with a risk reduction of 31% compared with 13% in people with CHD with no recent infarct (P=0.04). In the other blood pressure difference trials (excluding CHD events in trials of β blockers in people with CHD), there was a 22% reduction in CHD events (17% to 27%) and a 41% (33% to 48%) reduction in stroke for a blood pressure reduction of 10 mm Hg systolic or 5 mm Hg diastolic, similar to the reductions of 25% (CHD) and 36% (stroke) expected for the same difference in blood pressure from the cohort study meta-analysis, indicating that the benefit is explained by blood pressure reduction itself. The five main classes of blood pressure lowering drugs (thiazides, β blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and calcium channel blockers) were similarly effective (within a few percentage points) in preventing CHD events and strokes, with the exception that calcium channel blockers had a greater preventive effect on stroke (relative risk 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.98). The percentage reductions in CHD events and stroke were similar in people with and without cardiovascular disease and regardless of blood pressure before treatment (down to 110 mm Hg systolic and 70 mm Hg diastolic). Combining our results with those from two other studies (the meta-analyses of blood pressure cohort studies and of trials determining the blood pressure lowering effects of drugs according to dose) showed that in people aged 60-69 with a diastolic blood pressure before treatment of 90 mm Hg, three drugs at half standard dose in combination reduced the risk of CHD by an estimated 46% and of stroke by 62%; one drug at standard dose had about half this effect. The present meta-analysis also showed that drugs other than calcium channel blockers (with the exception of non-cardioselective β blockers) reduced the incidence of heart failure by 24% (19% to 28%) and calcium channel blockers by 19% (6% to 31%). Conclusions With the exception of the extra protective effect of β blockers given shortly after a myocardial infarction and the minor additional effect of calcium channel blockers in preventing stroke, all the classes of blood pressure lowering drugs have a similar effect in reducing CHD events and stroke for a given reduction in blood pressure so excluding material pleiotropic effects. The proportional reduction in cardiovascular disease events was the same or similar regardless of pretreatment blood pressure and the presence or absence of existing cardiovascular disease. Guidelines on the use of blood pressure lowering drugs can be simplified so that drugs are offered to people with all levels of blood pressure. Our results indicate the importance of lowering blood pressure in everyone over a certain age, rather than measuring it in everyone and treating it in some.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16af2bccf6c064916ccfc1a30a87716e30c309d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- T. Ivanova
- Philippe van de Borne
- Stephen Burgess
- S. Laurent
- M. Woodward
- I. Graham
- M. Ezzati
- George Davey Smith
Citations in the corpus
- 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. (2016, background): “5).(431) Initiation of BP-lowering drug treatment may also be”
- 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (2016, background): “5).(431) Initiation of BP-lowering drug treatment may also be”
- Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke (2011, neutral): “Compared with thiazides, β-blockers, ACEIs, and ARBs, calcium channel blockers appear to have a slightly greater effect on reducing the risk of stroke, although the effect is not seen for other cardiovascular outcomes and was of small magnitude (8% relative reduction in risk).(235) One meta-analysis”
- HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (2019, neutral): “Moreover, meta-analyses of event-based RCTs have shown the benefit of antihypertensive treatment in adults with CVD (secondary prevention) and an average BP within the same range.(40,41) Trials have also shown that low-dose pharmacotherapy in adults without CVD and an average SBP of 130–139 mm Hg or”
- 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (2017, neutral): “A meta-analysis of 147 randomized trials [431] reports only a slight inferiority of β-blockers Table 16 Clinical indications for the use of out-of-office blood pressure measurements (home blood pressure measurement, ambulatory blood pressure measurement)”
- Factors Influencing the Decline in Stroke Mortality (2013, methodology): “The percentage of patients with hypertension receiving treatment has increased to the point where >90% of the population know the relationship between HBP and stroke, nearly 70% of the adult hypertensive population are receiving treatment, and 46% of those treated have their blood pressure controlle”