Flower Choice and Learning in Foraging Bumblebees: Effects of Variation in Nectar Volume and Concentration
By J. Cnaani, James D. Thomson, D. Papaj. 2006
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff6cffaefd9add135faffc8a958d656f585a54fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- P. Wilson
- Steven B. Johnson
- C. Herrera
- James D. Thomson
- Clara Vega
- M. Rausher
- D. P. Vázquez
- X. Cerdá
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
- P. Wilson
- James D. Thomson
- C. Herrera
- Steven B. Johnson
- Clara Vega
- M. Rausher
- D. P. Vázquez
- X. Cerdá
Citations in the corpus
- Explaining Evolutionary Shifts between Bee and Hummingbird Pollination: Convergence, Divergence, and Directionality (2008, background): “For example, bumblebees strongly prefer smaller volumes of more concentrated nectar to energetically equivalent, larger volumes of more dilute nectar (Cnaani et al. 2006).”
- Yeasts in floral nectar of some South African plants: Quantification and associations with pollinator type and sugar concentration (2009, background): “On the basis of choice experiments, several authors have stated that insects (Waller, 1972; Pivnick and McNeil, 1985; Cnaani et al., 2006; Whitney et al., 2008) and birds (Stiles, 1976; Roberts, 1996) prefer nectar rewards with higher sugar concentration than dilute solutions.”