The modified Gurson model accounting for the void size effect

By J. Wen, Yonggang Huang, K. Hwang, Cheng Liu, Ming Li. 2004

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff6b7eb4f5d9c9dfdcdd4b0f91cec87642b123d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. Mark F. Horstemeyer
2. Yonggang Huang
3. Philippe H. Geubelle
4. Cheng Liu
5. Gregory J. Wagner
6. Wing Kam Liu
7. Ted Belytschko
8. Rui Huang

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Mark F. Horstemeyer
2. Yonggang Huang
3. Philippe H. Geubelle
4. Gregory J. Wagner
5. John A. Rogers

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Philippe H. Geubelle
2. G. Potirniche
3. P. Gullett
4. H. Tan
5. Yonggang Huang
6. Mark F. Horstemeyer
7. Cheng Liu
8. Gregory J. Wagner

Citations in the corpus

• A molecular dynamics study of void growth and coalescence in single crystal nickel (2006, background): “Void size effect on the evolution of the void volume fraction during void growth was examined at macroscale by Wen et al. (2005) , and they concluded that under uniaxial tension, the stress–strain curve is significantly influenced at larger void volume fractions.”
• The Mori–Tanaka method for composite materials with nonlinear interface debonding (2005, background): “…Mori and Tanaka, 1973; Christensen and Lo, 1979; Christensen, 1990; Huang et al., 1994a,b, 1995; Huang andHu, 1995), and therefore cannot predict the observed particle size effect (Huang and Li, 2004; Huang et al., 2004; Hwang et al., 2004; Liu and Hu, 2005; Rashid et al., 2004; Wen et al., 2005).”