Why Do More Polarized Countries Run More Procyclical Fiscal Policy?
By Jaejoon Woo. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009
188 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff66d5c5024883a4caf6062cf2e0dca9c49a8ab8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Political Science and International Relations
- I. Mihov
- Antonio Fatás
- J. Fuentes
- C. Calderón
- K. Staehr
- Jaejoon Woo
- Eduardo A. Cavallo
- Manmohan S. Kumar
Citations in the corpus
- Flexible Fiscal Rules and Countercyclical Fiscal Policy (2016, background): “…for tackling the root causes of fiscal profligacy, including notably issues related to polarized social preferences (Talvi and Végh, 2005; and Woo, 2009), conflicts of interest between political parties (Alesina and Tabellini, 1990), agency problem between voters and politicians (Alesina and…”
- Government Debt and Economic Growth (2013, background): “Thus, high public debt reduces the ability to implement countercyclical fiscal policies, resulting in higher volatility and lower growth (Aghion and Kharroubi, 2007; Woo, 2009).”
- Policy Volatility, Institutions, and Economic Growth (2013, methodology): “4 Woo (2009) also provides evidence that mismanagement in fiscal policy measured as procyclical and volatile fiscal policy can harm growth. macroeconomic policy.”
- Walking Hand in Hand: Fiscal Policy and Growth in Advanced Economies (2012, unknown): “9 Some have also argued that pub7 High debt is also likely to constrain the scope for countercyclical fiscal policies, which may result in higher output volatility (Aghion and Kharroubi, 2007; Woo, 2009).”