Overt Bias in Observational Studies

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Propensity Scores (2005, unknown): “Rosenbaum (2002c) offered three cautions against doing so: (a) The relationship between the covariate and outcome is not considered and is just as important in many respects; (b) statistical significance is not a prerequisite for practical relevance, especially because the former depends so heavily…”
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online (2021, background): “, has no more than the nominal Type I error rate) in finite samples (Fisher, 1937; Imbens & Rubin, 2015; Rosenbaum, 2002; Rubin, 1980).”