A comparison between gravity wave momentum fluxes in observations and climate models

By M. Geller, M. Alexander, P. Love, Julio Bacmeister, M. Ern, A. Hertzog, E. Manzini, P. Preusse, Kaoru Sato, Adam A. Scaife and 1 more. 2013

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff58953939996aad00543656903d6bebf34411e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. M. Ern
2. M. Mlynczak
3. M. Riese
4. J. Russell
5. P. Preusse
6. John Gille
7. H. Liu
8. M. Alexander

In Oceanography

1. M. Ern
2. Bjorn Stevens
3. M. Esch
4. E. Manzini
5. John Gille
6. P. Preusse
7. C. Hohenegger
8. T. Mauritsen

Citations in the corpus

• GRACILE: a comprehensive climatology of atmospheric gravity wave parameters based on satellite limb soundings (2017, methodology): “As discussed in Geller et al. (2013), there are currently two different approaches of treating those altitude profiles that do not match in their vertical wavelength.”
• ICON‐A, the Atmosphere Component of the ICON Earth System Model: I. Model Description (2018, methodology): “These settings were based on the experience gained on the sensitivity of the net momentum fluxes in the lowermost stratosphere to the launching height (Manzini &McFarlane, 1998), on the plausible range of the gravity wave variances estimated to be in the order of a few m/s (Fritts & Nastrom, 1992), ”