Growth and balance

By A. DiCarlo, S. Quiligotti. 2002

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Active Stress vs. Active Strain in Mechanobiology: Constitutive Issues (2012, unknown): “The meaning of this assumption is as follows: in absence of exter nal forces the minimum of energy (the relaxed configuration) is shifted by the internal a ctive forces to the configuration F = F−1 a and no energy is stored by the action of the internal active fo rces [6].”
Multiparameter actuation for shape control of bistable composite plates (2010, methodology): “We borrow the term relaxed stance from DiCarlo and Quiligotti (2002) to underline that the configuration with zero-stress may be geometrically unreachable, because eR and kR need not to satisfy the implicit compatibility condition (2).”
Stress-Modulated Growth (2007, methodology): “The accretive forces introduced by Di Carlo and Quiligotti are re-interpretated as homeostatic value of the Eshelby stress, coinciding with the classical biomechanical concept of homeostatic stress in the case of infinitesimal strain.”
Growth and instability in elastic tissues (2005, background): “This early seminal work on growth has since been amply discussed (Drozdov and Khanina, 1997; Cowin, 2004; Humphrey, 2003) and put on a more rigorous foundation (Epstein and Maugin, 2000; DiCarlo and Quiligotti, 2002; Lubarda and Hoger, 2002).”