The convergence process in heritage tourism.

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Heritage Site Perceptions and Motivations to Visit (2006, methodology): “There have been several attempts to define and explain heritage tourism in the literature (Apostolakis 2003). Timothy and Boyd (2003) argued that two main approaches to heritage tourism can be identified: one emphasizing supply and one emphasizing demand. The first approach, termed by Apostolakis (2”
A Choice Modeling Application for Greek Heritage Attractions (2005, result): “In practical terms, this finding is in line with Apostolakis’s (2003) arguments regarding the focal nature of authenticity in heritage tourism operations.”
Heritage Tourism in Singapore Chinatown: A Perceived Value Approach to Authenticity and Satisfaction (2016, background): “Numerous researchers have suggested that authenticity serves as the fundamental basis for the derivation of consumer value, particularly in the context of heritage tourism (see for example Apostolakis, 2003; Kolar & Zabkar, 2010).”
Visitors' Preferences for Interpretation at Heritage Sites (2009, background): “Specifically, in line with the “experientially-based” approach (Apostolakis 2003, p. 799), the current research explores visitors’ perceptions of the site relative to their personal heritage, which may be linked to individual personal characteristics such as gender, age, religious affiliation, and…”