The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature

387 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Repairing the R&D market failure: Public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D (2017, methodology): “…analysis in a study conducted by Dimos and Pugh (2016) reported an overall additionality effect of the R & D subsidy on private R &D. Dimos and Pugh (2016) investigated the 52 case studies published in or after 2000 and examined the effect of public R & D subsidy on private R &D…”
Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure (2016, background): “…2008; Hussinger, 2008) to being unable to reject “crowding-out” effects (Lach, 2002; Heijs and Herrera, 2004).7 In a recent meta-regression analysis, Dimos and Pugh (2016) find no evidence of either crowding-out or substantial additionality effects, and state that the treatment of unobservable…”