Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption
By Benjamin Sheehan, Hyun Seung Jin, U. Gottlieb. Journal of business research, 2020
532 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Firms are deploying chatbots to automate customer service. However, miscommunication is a frequent occurrence in human-chatbot interaction. This study investigates the relationship between miscommunication and adoption for customer service chatbots. Anthropomorphism is tested as an account for the relationship. Two experiments compare the perceived humanness and adoption scores for (a) an error-free chatbot, (b) a chatbot seeking clarification regarding a consumer input and (c) a chatbot which fails to discern context. The results suggest that unresolved errors are sufficient to reduce anthropomorphism and adoption intent. However, there is no perceptual difference between an error-free chatbot and one which seeks clarification. The ability to resolve miscommunication (clarification) appears as effective as avoiding it (error-free). Furthermore, the higher a consumer’s need for human interaction, the stronger the anthropomorphism - adoption relationship. Thus, anthropomorphic chatbots may satisfy the social desires of consumers high in need for human interaction.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff36821bd58f2662aa073682c3f27b2fd1d204bb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
Citations in the corpus
- A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots (2021, background): “Some of these keywords were also mentioned in relevant works of literature: “con-versational entities” appears in [25]; “conversational agents” appears in [26,27], and in [28]; “conversation system” appears in the title of [29,30].”