International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance
By Thomas B. Ginsburg. 2005
154 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff2ab7fec4a18c84419c247354e2db663ff8d330
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Yoram Z. Haftel
- Eric Neumayer
- Jennifer L. Tobin
- S. Rose-Ackerman
- Laura Spess
- Thomas Plümper
- Indra de Soysa
- Sonal S. Pandya
Citations in the corpus
- Ratification counts: US investment treaties and FDI flows into developing countries (2010, background): “New governments may find the terms of the investment objectionable or incompatible with their preferences and policies (Ginsburg, 2005).”
- When BITs have some bite: The political-economic environment for bilateral investment treaties (2011, background): “11 For the contrasting view see Ginsburg (2005) .”
- Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries (2005, background): “Developing countries challenged its validity as part of their demands for a New International Economic Order with some success: Resolution 1803 of the United Nations General Assembly merely requires ‘appropriate compensation’ for expropriation (Ginsburg 2004).”