Lying in Wait for Extinction: Ecological Correlates of Conservation Status among Australian Elapid Snakes
By R. Reed, R. Shine. 2002
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff286455319ae3b0c0da01d6ec50b344d2f9ccc1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- José Carlos Brito
- D. Noakes
- Zhihua Zhou
- Neftalí Sillero
- R. McLaughlin
- K. Norris
- Zhigang Jiang
- K. Lips
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
- K. Lips
- José Carlos Brito
- D. Noakes
- Zhihua Zhou
- Neftalí Sillero
- R. McLaughlin
- K. Norris
- Zhigang Jiang
Citations in the corpus
- Ecological Traits Predicting Amphibian Population Declines in Central America (2003, background): “…or niches, small population size, fluctuating abundance, long generation times, low reproductive rates, migratory stages, complex life cycles, and large body size (Rabinowitz et al. 1986; Lande 1988; Pimm et al. 1988; McKinney 1997; Williams & Hero 1998; Dulvy & Reynolds 2002; Reed & Shine 2002).”
- International Trade Status and Crisis for Snake Species in China (2004, background): “For Australian elapid species, a “sit-and-wait” foraging mode correlates with threatened status, and species with larger female body sizes are more vulnerable (Reed & Shine 2002).”
- Managing threatened species: the ecological toolbox, evolutionary theory and declining-population paradigm (2004, background): “…at the individual level with their population dynamic consequences (Sutherland 1996; Kokko & Sutherland 1998), and the application of ecological theory to understanding the vulnerability of species to agents of population decline (Owens & Bennett 2000; Purvis et al. 2000; Reed & Shine 2002).”
- Heads you win, tails you lose: Life‐history traits predict invasion and extinction risk of the world's freshwater fishes (2017, unknown): “…(Cooper, Bielby, Thomas, & Purvis, 2008; Rago, While, & Uller, 2012), birds (Blackburn, Cassey, & Lockwood, 2009; Owens & Bennett, 2000), reptiles (Reed & Shine, 2002; van Wilgen, Wilson, Elith, Wintle, & Richardson, 2010), fishes (Marr et al., 2013; Reynolds, Webb, & Hawkins, 2005), arthropods…”
- Effects of low-head barriers on stream fishes: taxonomic affiliations and morphological correlates of sensitive species (2006, background): “This creates the need to either spend more time and money assessing the remaining species or to seek effective predictors of sensitivity (Dulvy and Reynolds 2002; Reed and Shine 2002).”
- Inferring habitat-suitability areas with ecological modelling techniques and GIS: A contribution to assess the conservation status of Vipera latastei (2006, background): “Ambush predation as foraging strategy: Ambush predation is often associated with low food acquisition (Reed and Shine, 2002), which in turn results in slow growth, delayed maturation, and infrequent reproduction (Shine, 1980), hence suggesting a strong linkage between vulnerability to extinction…”
- Biases in the current knowledge of threat status in lizards, and bridging the ‘assessment gap’ (2016, unknown): “Few assessments of reptile extinction risk were completed prior to Böhm et al. (2013), and those that were focused on specific taxonomic groups (elapid snakes, Reed and Shine, 2002; lacertid lizards, Siliceo and Diaz, 2010; New Zealand lizards, Tingley et al., 2013a).”