Reproductive toxicity of metals in calanoid copepods

By S. Hook, N. Fisher. 2001

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Homeostasis and toxicology of essential metals (2012, result): “…this observation is that naturally incorporated metal is more available for uptake, and thus has more deleterious effects than metals spiked into artificial diets, an interpretation that is in agreement with a number of studies on invertebrates (Hook and Fisher, 2001, 2002; Bielmyer et al., 2006).”
Trophic transfer of seven trace metals in a four-step marine food chain (2008, background): “The routes of exposure of an aquatic animal to metals can influence tissue distributions and the fates of metals that are ingested (Fisher et al. 1996, Hook & Fisher 2001, Pickhardt et al. 2006), potentially influencing metal bioavailability to predators.”
Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments of Inorganic Metals and Metalloids: Current Status (2003, background): “Similarly, exposure duration is affected by binding processes, and organisms can bind and sequester metals within their tissues (Hook and Fisher 2002); where such binding is to an exoskeleton, the metals are relatively inert (Hook and Fisher 2001a).”