Will Livestock Intensification Help Save Latin America's Tropical Forests?

By D. Kaimowitz, A. Angelsen. 2008

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fef6eade02e3727a2253566417b181777c9922bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. S. Engel
2. Maria Bowman

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Maria Bowman
2. S. Engel
3. Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho
4. F. Merry
5. Daniel C. Nepstad
6. Sven Wunder
7. E. Milner‐Gulland

Citations in the corpus

• The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, background): “When PES are made, the capital constraint of landholders may be relaxed and the more profitable activity can become the relevant alternative, thus raising opportunity costs (Kaimowitz and Angelsen, 2008; Reutemann and Engel, 2016).”
• Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: A spatial analysis of the rationale for beef production (2012, background): “…return to cutting forest and ranching xtensively is lower than that of intensifying (e.g. Kaimowitz and ngelsen, 1998; Cattaneo, 2008), and as Kaimowitz and Angelsen 2008) point out, it is possible that if intensification proves proftable, it will increase rather than decrease the demand for…”