Global Climate Change: A Challenge to Policy

By Kenneth J. Arrow. 2007

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fef4186f801301be61319b61b0d9a0552cd81152

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Luke Brander
2. P. V. Beukering
3. Jonathan Aldred
4. Michael Greenstone
5. A. Wolverton
6. E. Kopits
7. Roy Brouwer
8. Partha Dasgupta

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Luke Brander
2. P. V. Beukering
3. Jonathan Aldred
4. Roy Brouwer
5. Michael Greenstone
6. Partha Dasgupta
7. A. Wolverton
8. E. Kopits

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Jonathan Aldred
2. P. V. Beukering
3. Roy Brouwer
4. Michael Greenstone
5. Luke Brander
6. Partha Dasgupta
7. A. Wolverton
8. E. Kopits

Citations in the corpus

• Discounting for Climate Change (2009, unknown): “Many analysts attributed this to the very low rate of pure time preference adopted by the Stern author team (Arrow 2007;Jensen & Webster 2007;Mendelsohn 2008;Nordhaus 2007;Weyant 2008).”
• Ethics and Climate Change Cost-Benefit Analysis: Stern and After (2009, methodology): “Elsewhere, the majority revealed preference view among economists was adopted by Lomborg’s ‘Copenhagen Consensus’ panel, and endorsed again in the aftermath of Stern by Arrow, Nordhaus and Weitzman, among others (Arrow 2007; Lomborg 2004; Nordhaus 2007).”
• The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes (2008, unknown): “However, the most positive verdict in the economic literature on the Stern Review is that it was right for the wrong reasons (Arrow 2007; Weitzman 2007a).”
• Developing a Social Cost of Carbon for US Regulatory Analysis: A Methodology and Interpretation (2013, background): “The literature generally adopts values forZ in the range of 0.5 to 3, with a clustering around 2 (Arrow 2007; Dasgupta 2007, 2008; Hall and Jones 2007; Nordhaus 2009; Szpiro 1986; Weitzman 2007, 2009).”
• Discounting climate change (2008, methodology): “preference adopted by the Stern author team ( Arrow 2007; Jensen & Webster 2007;Mendelsohn”
• “A convenient truth”: air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions (2008, result): “damage costs. Adjusting these assumptions towards more generally acceptable values, however, still results in estimates of damage costs that warrant extensive greenhouse gas mitigation ( Arrow 2007 ).”