Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication
By Iczn Iczn. ZooKeys, 2012
673 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has voted in favour of a revised version of the amendment to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature that was proposed in 2008. The purpose of the amendment is to expand and refine the methods of publication allowed by the Code, particularly in relation to electronic publication. The amendment establishes an Official Register of Zoological Nomenclature (with ZooBank as its online version), allows electronic publication after 2011 under certain conditions, and disallows publication on optical discs after 2012. The requirements for electronic publications are that the work be registered in ZooBank before it is published, that the work itself state the date of publication and contain evidence that registration has occurred, and that the ZooBank registration state both the name of an electronic archive intended to preserve the work and the ISSN or ISBN associated with the work. Registration of new scientific names and nomenclatural acts is not required. The Commission has confirmed that ZooBank is ready to handle the requirements of the amendment.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fef352cc87c95ba587bdf9a864509779898c4777
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Phil J. Bouchet
- Wayne P. Maddison
- J. Doyle
- P. B. Matheny
- P. K. Endress
- Lindsay E. Zanno
- K. Yoshizawa
- S. Trewick
In Genetics
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- A phylogenetic classification of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) (2015, background): “This strongly indicates considerable homoplasy in bulb rotation, and is the reason I mostly ignore the degree of rotation (embolus length), unlike Prószyński (2015), whose classification (unpublished by the rules of the ICZN 2012) appears to be heavily influenced by degree of rotation.”
- Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families (2017, background): “23.9 of the Code, Bouchet & Rocroi (2005: 112) declared Bertiniidae a nomen oblitum and Nacellidae a nomen protectum.”