Peer-to-Peer Markets

By Liran Einav, Chiara Farronato, Jonathan Levin. 2015

529 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fedd38ab4bf9fa8f653b3da2e86a0fe1721d9901

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy (2020, background): “Economists emphasized the ability of algorithms and crowd-sourced ratings and reputational information to reduce transaction costs and foster trust, enabling peers to compete in these new markets (Einav et al. 2016, Horton & Zeckhauser 2016, Sundararajan 2016).”
Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform (2018, background): “1.1.3 Peer-to-Peer Platforms and Matching Frictions Einav et al. (2016) and Goldfarb and Tucker (2017) provide great surveys on how digital technology has reduced matching frictions and improved market eﬃciency.”
Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants (2018, background): “Markets amenable to P2P trading are characterized by demand variability and diversity and low production economies of scale 27 .”
Multiclass Energy Management for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Driven by Prosumer Preferences (2019, background): “Two distinct types of P2P markets can be identified [29]: 1) P2P markets with individual sellers responsible for adjusting prices (e.”
Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review (2018, background): “P2P and community-based concepts have strongly been applied under a collaborative economy principle(8) as the structure that facilitates the exchange of commons amongst all agents (or peers) [26, 27], and they are rather distinct from the centralized structures seen in some traditional economic sect”
Crowdsourced Delivery - A Dynamic Pickup and Delivery Problem with Ad Hoc Drivers (2016, background): “In line with these studies, Fatnassi et al. (2015) investigate the integration possibility of passengers and parcels transportation in the context of the automated transport systems for city logistics.”
On-Demand Service Platforms (2018, methodology): “Finally, modeling and empirical work (e.g., Einav et al. 2016, Zervas et al. 2016) examines the impact of platform entry on incumbents.”
Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues (2016, background): “A very balanced position can also be found in Einav et al (2015), which is based on theoretical and empirical economics.”
Bilateral Contract Networks for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading (2019, background): “Sectors amenable to P2P trading are characterised by a lack of economies of scale, and diversity of demand [17].”
The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the 'Sharing Economy' (2016, background): “35 Ratings can be biased and inflated and it is possible that platforms present the results of search in a way that is more convenient to them than to the users (Einav et al., 2015).”
The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation? (2016, unknown): “Certainly, if growth continues at this fast pace, these new markets could encroach on traditional and long-term forms of employment (Einav et al., 2015, p. 20).”
The Effect of Home-Sharing on House Prices and Rents: Evidence from Airbnb (2021, unknown): “Because the literature on the topic is quite vast, here we focus only on papers that are closely related to ours and refer the reader to Einav et al. (2016) for an overview of the economics of peer-to-peer markets and to Proserpio and Tellis (2017) for a complete review of the literature on the…”
The Current and Future State of the Sharing Economy (2017, background): “A deeper economic analysis can look at this issue from a regulatory perspective on sharing and the use of individual data (Einav et al., 2016).”