INFORMATION SYSTEMS EPISTEMOLOGY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

525 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline (2008, background): “In design science the researcher “creates and evaluates IT artifacts intended to solve identified organisational problems” [[39], p.”
On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective (2006, background): “It is not truly revolutionary, however, since the discourse on truth and disinformation has been ongoing for over 20 years (Hirschheim, 1985).”
Seizing the opportunity: towards a historiography of information systems (2012, unknown): “For clarification purposes, we relate the supplementarist-integrationist-reorientationist typology to the three epistemological positions of positivism, interpretivism and critical research, well known in IS research (Hirschheim, 1985; Orlikowski and Baroudi, 1991; Walsham, 1993, 1995; Klein and Mye”
Grounded Theory in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Review and Guidelines (2016, background): “It comprises five pillars [43]: • Unity of the scientific method : the same approach to knowledge acquisition applies to all forms of enquiry.”
A critical analysis of decision support systems research (2005, unknown): “Europe 'A' Europe 'Other' interpretivism (Orlikowski and Baroudi, 1991; Walsham, 1995b; Cavaye, 1996) and to a lesser extent, critical theory (Hirschheim, 1992).”