What’s in an object file? Evidence from priming studies
By Ronald D. Gordon, David E. Irwin. 1996
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Anirudh Goyal
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- Yoshua Bengio
- Charles Spence
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Sergey Levine
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Rather, they suggested that these effects could simply be explained in terms of the semantic priming of one object/event by another (see Gordon and Irwin, 1996).”
- Inductive biases for deep learning of higher-level cognition (2020, background): “e different “object files” in cognitive psychology (Noles et al., 2005; Gordon and Irwin, 1996; Kahneman et al., 1992)).”
- The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. (2001, background): “However, object-specific preview benefits were demonstrated with letters (Henderson 1994) and words (Gordon & Irwin 1996) even if the letter case was randomly changed from prime to probe presentation.”
- Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. (2004, unknown): “First, whereas Kahneman et al. found hardly any evidence for OBJECT-NONSPECIFIC REPETITION EFFECTS, other studies were more successful in this respect [ 10 ,11].”